23 Comments

Your coverage of these events has been some of the clearest and most helpful. Great work!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!

Expand full comment

nice work joey

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Kyla!

Expand full comment

Enjoyed how you unpacked it so clearly!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Mar 19, 2023Liked by Joseph Politano

Excellent article

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Marlon!

Expand full comment

Joseph, where do you unearth all of these fascinating factoids. You do one heck of a research paper everytime you write one of these. This was very informative and thanks for your hard work.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Robert for the kind words! Most of the time I just try to collect data and add the research on top of that, but with these recent SVB posts I have found myself with more information than I know what to do with. I don't think I'm at risk of running out of angles to cover this story from yet!

Expand full comment

Excellent reporting on this J dog. Sharing a bunch of your articles tomorrow morning.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!! I really appreciate it <3

Expand full comment

Wow, I’m bothered that the messaging has been that the Fed will only front $25 billion, but under the hood they put up $300 billion.

Why bother announcing the $25 billion if it’s not really needed behind the discount window lending?

Expand full comment
author

The $25B figure is only the amount from the Treasury to backstop the BTFP in case of possible losses (which I would not expect to happen at all)

Expand full comment

I’m curious- why wouldn’t there be losses? There is no cash or they wouldn’t need the funds. Selling their short term debt will be (probably) loss free, but moving the long term debt at lower interest rates will bring significant losses when not hidden as “held to maturity”. Where else can they pay back the loans from?

Expand full comment
author

Only way for the Fed to lose money via the BTFP is for counterparties banks to go under, the most likely way for counterparties to go under is to have runs that force them to realize unrealized losses, and BTFP lending itself should help prevent more runs. Higher rates themselves are usually a boon to banks because the margins between what they make on loans and what they get on deposits increase, and most banks don't have the duration exposure of SVB, so BTFP should just buy them enough time to make up for a lot of the unrealized losses.

Expand full comment

But doesn’t the discount window have a 15-30-90 day due date? How are the banks with duration mismatch issues going to close those issues within that time?

Expand full comment
author

BTFP has terms of up to 1yr (and theoretically some banks could borrow from the BTFP for two years if they borrow in two subsequent 1 year increments)

Expand full comment

True- but wasn’t that only the $25 billion not every discount window loan?

Expand full comment

Excellent read. Thank you JP.

I would say the US federal reserve is not going to stop hiking rates anytime soon. I hope all are prepared for what’s coming. This is my take.

https://finiche.substack.com/p/risk-management-shines-as-markets

Expand full comment

Will the Fed merely pause, or will they have to accept today's inflation as the new normal?

Expand full comment

Thank you for your coverage and insights!

The breakdown of regional Fed lending is great. Where does one access the data on the regional Feds' Change in Loans, Securities, and Repos Since pre-SVB collapse? Is that on the H.4.1?

Expand full comment
author

Hey Nick! Yes, it's on H.4.1, table 6!

https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/20230323/

Expand full comment